By Dominic Jermano
World Prout Assembly
March 1, 2008

03/01/08 - "World Prout Assembly" - Obama has really not thought about what he is doing by running for President. Why should we give the Keys of the Atomic Bomb to Obama? Why should we sully the legacy of Martin Luther King and Black America with the sins from White America?

Democracy changed not when 911 hit the USA, but really when Harry Truman dropped two Atomic bombs on Japan, bringing the USA to the Nuclear Age. His act killed thousands of innocent Japanese civilians who had nothing to do with Japans military. This time of reckoning was neither known by scientists or politicians of Early America when the Constitution was written. To me this was a terrorist act.

This Atomic Power identified as the most lethal weapon known to mankind has proven to some to be a defense tool in changing the world and providing a weapon to the United States for its ultimate protection. And that very tool has changed the dynamics of the Constitution.

Unfortunately the bomb got into the hands of Russia, China, feared Pakistan, N. Korea, Libya and India. Their acquisition of the bomb has changed the scope of political views. Whether that was intentional or not is another topic of understanding the intended purposes to establish the long term nuclear program in American History.

Neo-cons believe it can't go away, because science is a reality, and can't be refuted. That being said countries that are not under the control of the US have the ability to go forward with their science and there is nothing to stop them if they have notions to use that science in destroying the United States.

Therefore the USA has Nuclear Weapons to defend itself in case of the unthinkable. The Republicans and some Democrats believe the problems with protecting Nuclear Secrets are of grave importance, and it requires strong conventional forces to do that. Barack Obama believes that, with statements saying he will attack Pakistan, and increase troops in Iraq , and need be to stop Iran from developing its nuclear capability.

If America does not have strong Conventional Forces to protect Nuclear Secrets, America becomes vulnerable to attack, by militias, guerillas, gangs, terrorists and spies. Conservative Americans are aware of this. Perhaps it's the reason why 911 happened? Think about that.

American military forces were on the decline, during Bill Clintons downsize after the first tour in ousting Saddam Hussein from Kuwait. This opened the eyes to Neo-Cons, concerning the rise of China, Russia, Iran, and the Middle East, during the beginning time of the Nuclear Crisis when Dr. Kahn setup Pakistan's Nuclear Program and began selling those secrets to N. Korea, Libya, and Iran. http://www.dawn.com/2004/02/02/top2.htm

Bill Clinton never talked about non-violence or authorized anti-nuclear arsenals. He fulfilled the promise of continued bombing of Iraq and eventually into Bosnia. Bill Clinton also never learned a thing from Martin Luther King.

What is America to do without a strong Conventional Military Force? Given these concerns with all the evidence pointing to a US 911, inside job, makes one consider these problems. America has always used military intimidation and it really has failed throughout the years. We are never at a time of peace. How long do we go on not recognizing that? We have had great men before us such as Martin Luther King who showed us the way, by practicing non-violence, but we have never instituted it into American policy. We always build more and advanced weapons sending those signals around the world which increase defense spending in foreign countries. This is what creates terrorism.

If we follow the teachings of MLK toward non-violence, and implement anti-nuclear arsenals, that would send a signal around the world. Other countries would also seek non-military objectives. This would result in the end to terrorism. So why does Obama not take up the cause of Martin Luther King?

The only acceptable route is to seek the end toward Nuclear Arsenals and practice the works of that great man. Now there was a guy that represented truth. He was a guy that fought off an entire American Military Complex walking in his armor and helmet wearing a trench coat under his salento felt hat and holding leaflets about his cause preaching and singing and telling us the story of the benefits of nonviolence. But today we are captivated by a black Senator who is pushing for war; a guy that would invade another country ( Pakistan ) in order to acquire Presidential recognition. What is it that people don't get about nonviolence?

We neglect our past, and forge a future that our past refuted, and somehow people believe that it's better. I fail to see the connection to dismissing our reputed dignitaries that have gone before us who refuted violence to then embrace Black America's enemy which is violence. Call me a racist, accuse me of smoking pot, but don't you dare accuse me of supporting violence, or even think I would support Barack Obama. I don't drink, I don't smoke, and I don't do drugs. I am of the old school, because we are the backbone and nonviolent mission to God on his earth.

Now we are standing at the threshold of another election. I would contend that elections are a thing of the past, because of the evidence of stolen elections, due to nuclear instability. This risk is a realization that Democracy gives the bomb to someone different every 4 years or 8 years. We might as well be tossing a hot potato around instead of eliminating the risk, by following nonviolent and anti-nuclear policies.

Every President is different; they come from different backgrounds, and hold different views about things. How is that we are a secure nation given the attack of 911 to think that perhaps one day one of the Presidents would use it? A clear example is the difference between Truman and Eisenhower. Truman did use it, even at the behest of Eisenhower¡¯s advice. And Eisenhower has really been the only Republican who has come even close to recognizing the need to have American non-violent policies, when he warned us about the expansion of the Military Industrial Complex.

We are dumbfounded by the inability to Impeach Presidents who break the law in concern to National Security from Harry Truman on down to GW Bush. And then somehow we are going to feel right about the possibility of electing a Black American President who very well will continue the series of Presidential blunders, by spilling blood on Martin Luther King¡¯s legacy that has lasted for over 40 years.

Barack Obama will establish not only having become the first black President elected but also the first impeached one. Talk about a high tech lynching, on Martin Luther King. I get shivers up my spine when we hand over the nuclear keys to another crazy President each and every election cycle. How insecure and insane Democracy is.

Perhaps this is why Republicans rig elections because of the vulnerability in giving the nuclear bomb to any charming guy that comes along, because he has appealed with charisma to the people in swaying from the party who actually is responsible for its creation.
Is there a wonder why most governments do not want Democracy because of the inability to trust the nuclear handoff? Which is riskier having a man that stays in power for a lifetime, knowing the nuclear situation, or to toss the bomb around to different people every four to eight years? It is a serious question to consider.

Now we are about to give the Nuclear Bomb to Barack Obama? I don't know about you people but I think that is a serious risk! Why are we handing Atomic bomb authority to Black America! Obama really has not considered his actions or the real issues to Cultural Black America.

We are facing a choice between Obama who is black that came in strength from the legend of Martin Luther King. As we know Martin Luther King was against using violence. What has Obama said about nonviolence? ZERO! What has he said about eliminating nuclear weaponry arsenals in America? Absolutely nothing ¨Czero. What has he said about reducing the military? He wants to increase it. He simply has no conscious for Martin Luther King and his legacy, yet wants to use his legacy to power to increase and support the nuclear apparatus to the Military Industrial Complex just because he is black!

Who has he learned from, obviously not from Martin Luther King? And yet as Black America views Obama they forget about Martin Luther King and his message? If Obama can't listen to his forefather's advice what can we expect if he becomes President?

Giving Black America the Bomb if Barack became President will bring Black America to an entirely new cultural identification. Obama is really flushing Martin Luther King down the toilet. No longer will Black America be viewed as Martin Luther King's legacy, because clearly MLK was about nonviolence.

MLK would be against using the Atomic Bomb and the Military Industrial Complex and is probably the real reason why MLK never sought to become President in the United States during his lifetime. Is Black America willing to no longer identify with Martin Luther King and his legacy, by embracing a black President who willingly will use the bomb? This is a serious situation for Black America in the USA.

I say that without MLK our nation will crumble from the lack of that spiritual hope and mountain of faith he really established. MLK won for Black America the dignity blacks have today, and to think running for President is some high esteemed honor for black Americans really is a step down in the wrong direction.

I really think Obama needs to withdraw from the race, in order to preserve the stature and culture of Black America. This act alone will be the defining moment to his greatest achievement in America . He will therefore join the great Americans who refute Nuclear Weaponry and preserve the Life and Memory of Martin Luther King.

Democracy is a wonder, a system that has created its culture and then magically throws it in the trash the next day. Though we go through the exercise of Democracy, and hope for change, remember that the balance of society in preserving cultural identification is of paramount importance.

I am having hard time accepting the idea we should have a black President, because of the racial factor. You look at the crimes that have been committed by the Bush administration and we are seeing the difficulty in trying to Impeach them for their war Crimes.

Now I know earlier I said if Obama becomes President he will get blood on his hands by supporting the murdering violent present day policies of the Bush administration and have the distinction in also being the first Black American President to be impeached. Obama has come out against Impeachment of Bush showing his demeanor in continuing and supporting crimes from the Bush administration. This is not a happy or memorable time for Black Americans on this issue. But let¡¯s look further ahead.

Just think of the Impossibility and trouble we are looking at in trying to impeach a Black President when he commits acts of treason and commits more of the same war crimes as Bush. Executives will censor down the media faster than when Bush was in office claiming every dissatisfaction article written about Obama is racist.

Talk about having a do anything you want President. Just vote in a black one, because you can't prosecute blacks with Impeachment on the grounds of subverting the constitution because of the overtones of being racially prejudice.

Furthermore what words does Obama say in his campaign to suggest he wouldn't use the bomb? He is pro military, pro war, to include attacking Pakistan . His pundits don¡¯t make it seem he is anti MIC establishment. He literally says nothing about Martin Luther King, or how he follows his example.

And I am expected to have confidence in Obama when he has lied about not voting on the War in Iraq , when he wasn't even a Senator at the time? Which is worse a liar, or being accused as being a racist?

White America did create the bomb. George Bush's Grandfather Prescott was one of the overseers of the Manhattan Project. They are not going to let a rookie lying black senator have the authority to use the atomic bomb. And the way it looks today after 911 I doubt if anyone is going to get that authority, because of the risks involved.

September 11th is not what changed democracy in the USA but really it was the Atomic Bomb, the deadliest weapon known to mankind. 911 has created a lock down state with wire tapping, the elimination of Habeas Corpus, the authorization of torture, while taking away peoples civil liberties.

We feel secure in knowing that since Harry Truman in the succession of sitting Presidents they have all lied and committed crimes against humanity and yet none have come to the bar of Justice in Impeachment? We idly think our nation is secure when every four years we toss the atomic bomb around like a hot potato, thinking some sitting President won't use it? We have totally loss all sense to reason in security.

Here we have Obama who speaks nothing about anti nuclear concepts or following examples of Martin Luther King, and we are to believe he wouldn't use the bomb, or fulfill Bush and Cheney¡¯s permanent war into Iran? Somehow I know I am right. I know I am right in knowing how badly we need Impeachment in order to establish Americas nonviolent Anti-nuclear Policy.

I have first hand knowledge about US nuclear weapons because I was a Security Policeman for SAC in the United States Air force. I guarded nuclear missile silos and nuclear weapon development sites. My impression was; that nukes must be eliminated and never used; when I witnessed Sergeants and Ranking Officers with loyal airmen involved in using cocaine, marijuana, and amphetamines while on duty at this nuclear facility. Instead of guarding they partied on the tailgate of the pickup truck playing cards and getting high. I did my best to get out of the service, and alerted upper level Officials outside the base, and was lucky to get an honorable discharge instead of a bullet in the back of the head for raising hell about their dereliction.

I know I am no racist, I know I am speaking stuff that everyone wants to hear or should be educated on, and I know that electing Obama is the wrong thing to do at this time. We need to Impeach Bush and Cheney. When we have a successful Impeachment on the books, and we know Presidents can't get away with the crimes they have been committing for over 50 years now, then our security will be established.

Here we have the Patriot Act and Homeland Security, but not really folks! Because we do not have Impeachment to protect us from the crimes the President of the USA can commit on US, we the people

If we had Impeachment already on the books then I would feel that Black Americans or Native American Indians (or whatever ethic group) would have legal unbinding recognition as a sitting President because the color of their skin would not be a factor in the case of Impeachment in their future assumed dereliction of duty.

It is healthy to talk about black and white issues, because we were made to do so.