Home



News

"If we take the full meaning of the term society into consideration, it will be seen that till now human beings have not been able to form a real society. If India builds a society for only Indians, Pakistan for only Pakistanis, and England for only the English, then these three separate societies will exist, but we cannot look upon them as the society of humanity. Because humanity is divided into groups, one society will naturally try to thrive by exploiting the vitality of others. �You will notice that efforts are being made to establish so-called societies in some particular part of the world, for some particular section of the people, and based on some particular 'ism" or faith. A social consciousness based on such divisions lies latent in the minds of the people, whether they are Indian, Pakistani or English, so they remain absorbed in thoughts of their smaller groups." - Shrii Prabhat R. Sarkar


Subscribe to WPANews

"Human beings have still not been able to form a human society, and have still not learned to move with the spirit of a pilgrim. Although many small groups, motivated by self-interest, work together in particular situations, not even a small fraction of their work is done with a broader social motive. By strict definition, shall we have to declare that each small family unit is a society in itself? If going ahead in mutual adjustment only out of narrow self-interest or momentary self-seeking is called society, then in such a society, no provision can be made for the disabled, the diseased or the helpless, because in most cases nobody can benefit from them in any way... in that case there always remains the possibility of some people getting isolated from the collective. All human beings must attach themselves to others by the common bond of love and march forward hand in hand; then only will I proclaim it a society." - Shrii Prabhat R. Sarkar

"Power concedes nothing without a demand.' The struggle for justice must never be adjourned. The forces of injustice do not take vacations. Societies are not static in this regard. They await the political and civic energies of individuals who engage the arenas of power, multiply their numbers and emblazon in deeds and institutions the immortal principle that "Here the People Rule." - Ralph Nader

The Jordanian Option has Always Been Zionism’s Plan


The never-ending PSYOP, euphemistically termed “the nightly news,” is a continuing farce, where every word about the Palestinians is an Israeli-framed deception. The “freedom of [this] press” is a license to lie and to promote officially sanctioned disinformation to the American people. If it is not true that Zionists control our media, then how can you explain so many Israeli lies being spoon-fed to the American sheeple? - Peter Chamberlin

Peter Chamberlin
World Prout Assembly
June 18, 2008

It seems that the “cat has been let out of the bag” over the past couple of days, concerning the “Jordanian option,” allegedly revealed recently by McCain neocon advisor Robert Kagan, then just as quickly shot down. In a controversy started by Jordan Watch, “McCain will declare Jordan as a Palestinian state, and the Jordanians love him!”

http://www.jordanwatch.net/archive/2008/6/595196.html if McCain gets elected, he will support the total ethnic cleansing of Palestine, “transferring” all of them to Jordan.

“McCain's trusted neo-con political advisor Robert Kagan has stated in a lecture in New York that the natural state for the Palestinians will be Jordan.”

The next day, the same source retracted the charge, “Kagan Statement: Have we been Fooled?” http://www.jordanwatch.net/archive/2008/6/598062.html

“Ammon news agency, fabricating the whole story.”

That should have laid the whole rumor to rest. Right? Think again. Zionist-lite agitator Noam Chomsky, revealed in a 2007 interview at Democracy Now

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/27/1547221 that when Israeli leaders speak of the “two-state solution,” they have always considered Jordan to be the Palestinian state, and American leaders have always accepted it.

NOAM CHOMSKY:

“In 1988, as you know, the Palestinian National Council formally accepted a two-state settlement, and the Israeli government responded. This was the coalition government of Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Shamir. They responded by issuing a formal declaration that there can be no additional Palestinian state between Jordan and Palestine -- “additional” because for Shimon Peres and his Labor coalition, Jordan already was a Palestinian state. It’s a view that’s attributed to the right wing, but that’s mistaken. This is Shimon Peres....

The Bush Baker Plan endorsed Israel's position without qualification and went on to add that any Palestinian negotiators would have to accept that framework, namely no second Palestinian state in addition to Jordan.”

The never-ending PSYOP, euphemistically termed “the nightly news,” is a continuing farce, where every word about the Palestinians is an Israeli-framed deception. The “freedom of [this] press” is a license to lie and to promote officially sanctioned disinformation to the American people. If it is not true that Zionists control our media, then how can you explain so many Israeli lies being spoon-fed to the American sheeple?

Last Updated June 19, 2008 11:11 AM

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and
do not necessarily reflect those of the World Prout Assembly.

The World Prout Assembly is a non-profit organization affiliated with
Proutist Universal Global Headquarters, Kolkata, India.