Home



News

"If we take the full meaning of the term society into consideration, it will be seen that till now human beings have not been able to form a real society. If India builds a society for only Indians, Pakistan for only Pakistanis, and England for only the English, then these three separate societies will exist, but we cannot look upon them as the society of humanity. Because humanity is divided into groups, one society will naturally try to thrive by exploiting the vitality of others. �You will notice that efforts are being made to establish so-called societies in some particular part of the world, for some particular section of the people, and based on some particular 'ism" or faith. A social consciousness based on such divisions lies latent in the minds of the people, whether they are Indian, Pakistani or English, so they remain absorbed in thoughts of their smaller groups." - Shrii Prabhat R. Sarkar


Subscribe to WPANews

"Human beings have still not been able to form a human society, and have still not learned to move with the spirit of a pilgrim. Although many small groups, motivated by self-interest, work together in particular situations, not even a small fraction of their work is done with a broader social motive. By strict definition, shall we have to declare that each small family unit is a society in itself? If going ahead in mutual adjustment only out of narrow self-interest or momentary self-seeking is called society, then in such a society, no provision can be made for the disabled, the diseased or the helpless, because in most cases nobody can benefit from them in any way... in that case there always remains the possibility of some people getting isolated from the collective. All human beings must attach themselves to others by the common bond of love and march forward hand in hand; then only will I proclaim it a society." - Shrii Prabhat R. Sarkar

"Power concedes nothing without a demand.' The struggle for justice must never be adjourned. The forces of injustice do not take vacations. Societies are not static in this regard. They await the political and civic energies of individuals who engage the arenas of power, multiply their numbers and emblazon in deeds and institutions the immortal principle that "Here the People Rule." - Ralph Nader

Nader and Zinn do NOT endorse Obama


Simply put, this is an outright lie. Naturally, it comes from the corrupt Democrats who had filed some 80 law suits to keep Nader off the ballot in 2004. Neither Nader or Zinn are endorsing Obama now. In fact, Zinn just a day ago dropped his endorsement for Obama, being betrayed by Obama more and more, as Obama has become so close to McCain in view that it makes little difference which of the two is actually elected. MORE LIES BY OBAMA supporters. Shame on them. SolThree is a lying piece of shit, from my point of view, continually demonstrating a total lack of ethics and morality. Sort of like the typical Democratic candidate, as a matter of fact. - Robert T.

In a message dated 10/29/2008 1:42:48 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, nwest99@webtv.net writes:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ruralgreen/message/7846 <> Let it be known 2008 independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader and famous intellectual historian/philosopher Howard Zinn have endorsed voting for Barack Obama in swing states. The definition of so-called "swing-states" varies a bit, but here's the longest known listing of them: Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Texas, New Jersey, Washington, Mississippi, Louisiana, California, Michigan, Virginia, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Indiana, Missouri, Colorado, Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Iowa, Montana & Oregon. <> Recent polls also show the Obama-McCain race has become very close in McCain's home state of Arizona and the state of West Virginia - so they should be considered swing states this year. If you want to vote green party consider gubernatorial, state legislative, county & city level political offices, but I urge one and all to vote for democratic congressional office seekers or holders. An Obama white house will need as many congressional dems as possible to support its agenda. <>SolThree<>

October 29, 2008
www.votenader.org
www.officialnaderstore.com

Howard Zinn now says he's voting for Nader.
The famous historian lives in Massachusetts, where Obama is ahead by 20 points. Zinn created a stir earlier when he said he was voting for Obama. He legitimately took some heat for supporting the corporate Obama. But late last night, Zinn admitted in an e-mail to our campaign that he made a mistake and now says he will vote for Nader. And Zinn urges all people of conscience to vote for the true progressive in slam dunk states. Of which there are now many.(Zinn says that in non slam dunk states, he urges people to vote for Obama. We obviously disagree with that bit of advice.) Or as Ralph Nader put it today: "A vote for Nader/Gonzalez on November, rather than being wasted by piling onto an Obama landslide or McCain implosion, will produce a stronger hammer and watchdog for what millions of Americans want -- including public Medicare for all with private delivery and a living wage for the one in three workers who don't make one." "Unless millions of voters of conscience choose the progressive hammer and watchdog of Nader/Gonzalez, millions of votes will be tactically wasted and serve only to increase the mandateless landslide of Barack Obama." So, if you are ambivalent about this election, fear not.If you live in a slam dunk state, follow the advice of Howard Zinn. Vote Independent.Vote Nader for President.
Last Updated October 30, 2008 2:50 AM

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and
do not necessarily reflect those of the World Prout Assembly.

The World Prout Assembly is a non-profit organization affiliated with
Proutist Universal Global Headquarters, Kolkata, India.